Improving Low-Earth Orbit Predictions using Two-line Element Data with Bias Correction

J. C. Bennett (The Satellite Positioning for Atmosphere, Climate and Environment (SPACE) Research Centre, School of Mathematical and Geospatial Sciences, RMIT University and EOS Space Systems Pty. Ltd.), J. Sang (EOS Space Systems Pty. Ltd.), C. Smith (EOS Space Systems Pty. Ltd.), K. Zhang (The Satellite Positioning for Atmosphere, Climate and Environment (SPACE) Research Centre, School of Mathematical and Geospatial Sciences, RMIT University)

Keywords: Astrodynamics

Abstract:

In this paper we present results from our orbit prediction study using the publicly available Two-Line Element (TLE) sets. The method presented here is similar to that introduced by Levit and Marshall; however, we also consider the non-spherical low-Earth orbit satellites Grace A and Grace B. The method uses 10 days of TLE data which is interpolated using SGP4. A state vector is generated every 10 minutes in the orbit determination (OD) period. These generated states are subsequently used as observations in an orbit determination run considering a full set of forces to determine the orbit over the 10-day time span. All information used is from the TLE data sets. Once the orbit has been determined, it is then numerically propagated to obtain a prediction of the object’s position. The TLE-determined orbit is compared to highly accurate satellite laser ranging (SLR) Consolidated Prediction Format (CPF) data to assess the accuracy. We tested the technique by performing 200 independent simulations for Stella, Starlette, Grace A and Grace B and found that it resulted in better orbit predictions 98.5%, 93.4%, 97.5% and 95.5% of the time, respectively, when compared to standard SGP4 propagation. For Stella and Starlette after a 7 day prediction period the average absolute maximum along track bias was reduced by approximately 64% and 74%, respectively. For Grace A and Grace B after a 7 day prediction period the average absolute maximum along track bias was reduced by approximately 68% and 64%, respectively. The TLE-determined orbit contains bias in the along, across and radial tracks with the along track error dominating. If these can be estimated we can obtain an improved orbit prediction. We used our TLE-determined orbit as an initial state and determined an orbit 3 days after the 10 day OD period from only two passes of SLR data from a single station (Mount Stromlo, Australia). We then estimated the bias in the along track direction by fitting a quadratic function to the along track bias data. The error between the TLE-determined orbit and the SLR-determined orbit in the along (minus the quadratic bias), across and radial tracks was then estimated using sinusoidal functions. These estimations were then used to correct the TLE-determined orbit, resulting in drastic improvements in the prediction accuracy of low-Earth objects. For a prediction period of 7 days, the absolute maximum along track error for Grace A reduced from 16.6 km (SGP4) to 4.8 km with the TLE data fitting presented in this paper. With bias estimation this error was reduced to 1.7 km. This demonstrates the ability to obtain much more accurate orbit predictions using only two passes (19 normal point SLR ranging observations) from one station. In the operational sense, the presented method can be used in debris conjunction analyses to improve the accuracy and reliability of the conjunction predictions. This method is currently implemented in EOSSS’ conjunction analysis software. Objects of interest can then be tracked with EOSSS’ tracking facilities and much better orbit predictions can be obtained.

Date of Conference: September 11-14, 2012

Track: Astrodynamics

View Paper